[ATTENTION, anonymous comments will not be  published. Please use Google Account, OpenID or Name/URL to comment. Thank you]
      THERE are many ways to skin a cat, so goes an English  saying. Since a fair number of today's political bigwigs are English educated,  some spending many years in England, I believe they know its meaning.
      I believe that the cat refers not to our lovable  tabbies at home but to the big cats that the colonials loved to hunt – the  tigers, lions, leopards, cheetahs and jaguars.
      So when the government granted the privatisation of a  223.33-acre military land in Bukit Raja, Selangor, to a little-known private  company, Awan Megah Sdn Bhd, which belongs to the Selangor Wanita Umno chief,  Raja Ropiaah Raja Abdullah, turned into a mischief, it appears that it had not  skinned the cat the right way.
      And its silence on the vicious allegations that the  family of the Prime Minister, Mohd Najib Abdul Razak, was involved with carpet  dealer, Deepak Jaikishan, is deafening.
      The spat between the Umno bigwig and Jaikishan, who  claimed ownership of the land, saw the ghost of murdered Altantuya Shaariibuu  and the second statutory declaration by the mysterious PI Bala being brought to  live just as the general is around the corner.
      In the process, carpet trader sued his business  partner Raja Ropiah (which he recently claimed had been withdrawn) and  published an online book about the deal in which dragged members of Mohd  Najib's immediate family into the cesspool -- something that the opposition loves  to embrace and the Barisan Nasional could not afford as the GE looms.
      The sad thing is, the iconic Armed Forces Fund Board  (LTAT) had been dragged in as well or, more appropriately, had been used solve  the problem of the smelly carcass of the badly skinned big cat.
      Its property development arm, Boustead Holdings  Berhad, had stepped in to by the land and the concession that goes with it for  a combined price tag of RM160 million.
      I would not dare claim to know much about land  appropriation and property development. But when I was briefly involved (as a  junior partner) in the management buyout (MBO) of the New Straits Times Press  Berhad (NSTP) and Sistem Televisyen Malaysia Berhad (TV3) back in the early  1990s, we were involved in the privatisation of the Kuala Lumpur Railway  Station land that is today known as KL Sentral via the Bursa Malaysia-listed  property developer, the Malaysian Resources Corporation Berhad. Today, MRCB is  owned by the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) and KL Sentral has become the showpiece  of urban renewal. (I left NSTP and severed all relationship with MRCB/NSTP/TV3  groups in 2000). 
          There are certainly other better ways of privatising  the Bukit Raja land and, for that matter, all military and government-owned  landed properties. I have seen companies offering better terms for military  land. For instance, from the outset they roped in the LTAT by forming or  prosing to form joint venture companies in which the LTAT is the majority  shareholder. The private sector companies that made these proposals are  reputable Bursa Malaysia-listed companies.
      In one case that I came across, a Bursa  Malaysia-listed property developer proposed to acquire a piece of Ministry of  Defence land and replace it with a piece of land of equal size elsewhere and  build on it whatever is required by Mindef.
      It also pledged to build a military enclave on the  privatised site whereby serving and retired military personnel would be offered  special discounts to buy houses and apartments.
      But they were not always successful. People linked to  political parties or have access to the inner circles were more likely to  receive the privatisation and they would then sell the projects to developers  for quick profits.
      In the case of the Bukit Raja land, it was sold to  Boustead. If indeed Boustead had been eyeing the land since 2005, as it was  reported telling Bursa Malaysia, it should have made the bit itself instead of  buying it from a vendor.
      The moral of the story is, you either skin the big  cat well or you will get scratched. In the worse case scenario, the dying cat  may bite off your head.
          This brings back memories of the time past when we  had less conspicuous sleigh-of-hand traders, who, we in the north of the  Peninsula, were called tukang silap mata.
      They were usually Hindu Indians who claimed to have  special powers stored in their tangkal (amulets). The Malay peddlers, on the  other hand, had azimat. Many unwary, gullible and greedy people lost fortunes to  them.
      Then there were the Manik Koran traders. They were  usually middle aged Pakistani men who peddled trinkets and Koran on bicycles in  villages and small towns.
      The unique combination of trinkets (manik) and Koran  gave them the title Manik Koran traders. Some also sold carpets and prayer  mats.
      Having left their wives in Punjab or Sind, in  Pakistan, one could not blame these Manik Koran traders if they were sometimes  randy. Many village women fell for their charm, fair complexion and generosity.
      Some went on to marry local women and settled down  permanently in Malaya, but were still referred to as "kling" (from the ancient  Hindu Empire of Kalinga). Hence we had a Pakistani shopkeeper we called  kling Ibrahim in our village.
      Further back into time, the Malacca Empire fell to  the Portuguese in 1511 when an Indian aide of the Sultan, Kitol, betrayed his  boss by siding with the attackers.
           
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan